ICAI REG. NO. 139415 Peer-reviewed firm · Pune, India · Practicing since 2012

India-US Double Tax Treaty (DTAA) — Complete Guide for US Companies with Indian Subsidiaries (2026)

Table of Contents

India-US Double Tax Treaty (DTAA) — Complete Guide for US Companies with Indian Subsidiaries (2026)

By CA Rohit Lohade, KRPR & Associates  ·  Updated June 2026  ·  16 min read

Quick answer: The India-US DTAA reduces Indian withholding tax on dividends to 15% (if ≥10% holding) or 25%, royalties to 10–15%, and introduces the concept of Fees for Included Services (FIS) — which is narrower than the FTS concept in the India-UK DTAA. Standard end-user SaaS access without copyright rights or a transfer of technical know-how may generally be characterised as business profits rather than royalty or FIS. The conclusion depends on the contracting entity, invoice, agreement, applicable treaty and whether the non-resident has a PE in India. 18% GST under Reverse Charge applies separately. The US parent must provide Form 6166 from the IRS and file Form 41 (replaces Form 10F, effective 1 April 2026) to claim treaty rates.

KRPR & Associates — India tax advisory for US companies

250+ foreign subsidiaries  ·  Dedicated FEMA & transfer pricing desk  ·  ICAI Reg. No. 139415  ·  Peer Reviewed

Clients: Domino's · Wix · The Children's Place · Oyster HR  ·  rohit@krprassociates.com


1. What Is the India-US DTAA and Why Is It Different from Other Indian Tax Treaties?

The India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) was signed on 12 September 1989, entered into force on 18 December 1990, and was last amended by a Protocol in 2000. It remains in force as of June 2026 with no material amendments since the 2000 Protocol — notably, the US has not adopted the OECD MLI, unlike the UK and EU countries.

Two features make the India-US DTAA distinctly different from other Indian tax treaties — and both are commercially significant for US companies with Indian subsidiaries:

FeatureIndia-US DTAAIndia-UK / India-SG / India-Australia DTAAs
Fees for services conceptUses Fees for Included Services (FIS) — a narrower definition that requires services to make available technical know-how. Pure management and advisory fees typically do not qualify as FIS.Use Fees for Technical Services (FTS) — but also have the "make available" test and the India-UK DTAA expressly excludes managerial services. In practice, management fees are zero withholding under these treaties too if no PE exists — same outcome as the India-US DTAA.
US Saving ClauseArticle 1 preserves the US's right to tax its citizens and corporations on worldwide income regardless of the treaty. Relief is given through foreign tax credits, not treaty exemptions.No equivalent saving clause in most other Indian treaties.

Understanding these two differences is more valuable than memorising withholding tax rates — they determine whether India can tax your intercompany charges at all.

→ US company India subsidiary setup — full guide


2. What Are the Withholding Tax Rates Under the India-US DTAA?

Income typeIndia-US DTAA rateDomestic rate (no treaty)Treaty Article
Dividends — substantial holding (US parent holds ≥10% voting stock)15%~20.8%Article 10(2)(a)
Dividends — portfolio/other (US parent holds <10% voting stock)25%~20.8%Article 10(2)(b)
Interest10% for loans granted by a bank, similar financial institution or insurance company; 15% in other casesDomestic rate depends on the instrument and lenderArticle 11
Royalties — literary/artistic/scientific copyright, patents, trademarks15%~20.8%Article 12(2)(a)
Royalties — equipment rental; FIS ancillary to royalties10%~20.8%Article 12(2)(b)
Fees for Included Services (FIS) — services that make available technical know-how15% (standalone) or 10% (ancillary to royalty)~20.8%Article 12(4)
Management fees / advisory fees / coordination charges — not qualifying as FIS0% — Business Profits, not taxable if no PE~20.8% under domestic lawArticle 7
Standard end-user SaaS access — no copyright rights or technical know-how transferredMay be treated as Business Profits; a nil-withholding result requires the applicable treaty and no PE in IndiaFacts and domestic-law position must also be checkedApplicable treaty + Engineering Analysis
Capital gains on Indian sharesBoth countries may tax under domestic law — no treaty cap10–20% depending on holding periodArticle 13

Critical difference on dividends: Unlike the India-UK DTAA (which applies a single 15% rate), the India-US DTAA has two dividend rates depending on the holding percentage. Most wholly owned US parent subsidiaries hold 100% — so the 15% rate applies. But if a US investor holds less than 10% of voting stock, the rate is 25% — which is actually higher than the domestic Indian rate of ~20.8%. In that case, using the domestic rate is more beneficial than claiming the DTAA rate.


3. What Is the Fees for Included Services (FIS) Concept — and Why Does It Matter?

This is the most commercially important and most misunderstood aspect of the India-US DTAA. Most guides treat US-to-India service payments as automatically subject to 15% withholding. That is wrong — and the error can cost US companies significant unnecessary tax.

What is FIS under the India-US DTAA?

Under Article 12(4) of the India-US DTAA and the accompanying Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed on 12 September 1989, Fees for Included Services means payments for technical or consultancy services that either:

  • (a) Make available to the recipient technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how, or processes — meaning the Indian subsidiary can apply that knowledge independently after the service ends, without recurring assistance from the US provider; OR
  • (b) Are ancillary and subsidiary to the enjoyment of a right, property or information for which a royalty is charged under Article 12(3)

What does NOT qualify as FIS?

Service typeQualifies as FIS?Why
Management fees (CEO oversight, governance, group HR)No — Business ProfitsNo technical knowledge transferred. Calcutta High Court confirmed in Timken (2016): advisory services that transfer only commercial information are not FIS.
Advisory or consultancy feesNo — Business ProfitsCalcutta High Court, Timken case: "consideration for rendering advisory services cannot be treated as Fees for Included Services under Article 12(4)(b)"
IT support / helpdesk servicesNo — Business ProfitsITAT ruling confirmed: training and supporting users on software does not make available technical knowledge. "Imparting training or educating a person with respect to the functionality of software does not amount to rendering of technical service."
Marketing servicesNo — Business ProfitsNo transfer of technical know-how. FIS requires the recipient to be able to independently replicate the technical skill post-engagement.
Software development that delivers a custom productLikely yes — FIS or RoyaltyIf the US company develops software and the Indian entity can use the technical design independently, this may make available know-how.
Technical training that equips the Indian team permanentlyLikely yes — FISIf the Indian entity can independently replicate the technical process after training, the make-available test is met.
Reimbursement of costs on cost-to-cost basis (no markup)NoITAT Delhi, Invesco case (2025): IT support services recharged at cost without markup are not income — not taxable as FIS regardless of make-available test.

✅ The practical implication: Most routine intercompany charges from a US parent to its Indian subsidiary — management fees, advisory fees, marketing charges, admin coordination, IT support recharged at cost — do not qualify as FIS under the India-US DTAA. They are Business Profits under Article 7. If the US parent has no PE in India, India cannot tax these payments at all — zero withholding. This is a significant advantage of the India-US DTAA over the India-UK DTAA, where such charges often qualify as FTS at 15%.

→ Transfer pricing for US-India intercompany arrangements — KRPR


4. How Does a US Company Claim DTAA Benefits in India?

StepActionWhoTiming
1Obtain Form 6166 (Tax Residency Certificate) from the IRS confirming the US company is a US tax residentUS parent — apply to IRSAllow 4–6 weeks for IRS processing. Renew annually.
2File Form 41 electronically on India's Income Tax e-filing portal — replaces Form 10F under the Income Tax Act 2025, effective 1 April 2026. Contains US company's EIN, period of residency, nature of income, and address. No Indian PAN required for non-residents.US parent — e-filed on Income Tax India portalBefore the payment is made. File once per financial year per income stream.
3Provide beneficial ownership declaration — confirming the US parent is the beneficial owner, not a conduitUS parent — letter to Indian subsidiaryBefore the payment is made
4Where applicable, the Indian subsidiary obtains Form 15CB from a Chartered Accountant. It is generally required where taxable remittances or their aggregate exceed INR 5 lakh during the financial year and an alternative Assessing Officer certificate or order is not available.Indian subsidiary + CACheck before remittance
5The Indian subsidiary checks whether Form 15CA applies and files the appropriate part based on the nature and chargeability of the remittance.Indian subsidiary + CABefore remittance, where applicable
6Bank remits payment (net of applicable withholding) to US parent's accountBankAfter completing the applicable remittance documentation
7US parent claims Foreign Tax Credit (Form 1116 or Form 1118) for Indian TDS against US federal tax liabilityUS parent — US tax returnAnnual US filing

📋 Form 41 update (effective 1 April 2026): Form 10F has been replaced by Form 41 under India's Income Tax Act 2025 and Income Tax Rules 2026. Form 41 is filed electronically on India's e-filing portal. No PAN or Aadhaar is required for non-resident companies. Form 10F remains applicable only for income received up to 31 March 2026. For all payments from FY 2026-27 onwards, US parent companies must file Form 41 — not Form 10F.


5. What Creates a Permanent Establishment in India for a US Company?

PE risk is critically important — if a PE of the US parent is found to exist in India, all profits attributable to it are taxable in India at the full foreign company rate of up to 40% plus surcharge and cess.

What creates a fixed-place PE under Article 5?

SituationPE risk?Notes
US company's Indian subsidiary (wholly owned Pvt Ltd)No — by itselfA subsidiary is a separate legal entity. It does not create a PE of the US parent automatically.
US company has an office, branch, or factory in IndiaYes — fixed place PEAny fixed place from which business is wholly or partly carried on creates a PE.
Construction / installation project in India lasting more than 120 daysYes — construction PENote: the India-US DTAA threshold is 120 days — shorter than many other treaties (typically 6–12 months). Many US companies are caught out by this.
US personnel furnish services in IndiaPotential service PEA service PE may arise when services continue for more than 90 days within any 12-month period. For services furnished to an associated enterprise, the treaty can apply without the usual 90-day threshold. Track personnel, recipient and days carefully.
Indian subsidiary employee who habitually concludes contracts on behalf of the US parentYes — dependent agent PEThe most common and most overlooked PE risk. See detailed explanation below.

The dependent agent PE — the most common mistake US companies make

A dependent agent PE may arise where a person in India, other than an independent agent acting in the ordinary course of business, habitually exercises authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the US parent, or habitually maintains a stock of goods from which deliveries are regularly made for the US parent. This is separate from and in addition to the Indian subsidiary.

Common situations that create a dependent agent PE:

  • Indian subsidiary sales team signs sales contracts in the name of the US parent (not in the name of the Indian subsidiary)
  • Indian subsidiary employees negotiate and finalise commercial terms on behalf of the US parent with Indian customers or suppliers
  • US parent's products are sold in India through the Indian subsidiary acting as a commission agent, where the subsidiary habitually secures orders for the US parent

⚠ The 120-day construction PE threshold: US companies in engineering, IT implementation, or construction that send teams to India for project work frequently exceed the 120-day threshold without realising the PE consequence. The India-US DTAA's 120-day threshold is among the shortest of any of India's bilateral treaties. A project team in India for 4 months creates a PE of the US parent — at 40% tax on attributable profits. Track India project days carefully and seek advice before a project exceeds 90 days.

→ PE risk management and intercompany structuring — KRPR


6. Real-World Examples — How the DTAA Applies to Specific US-India Payments

Here is how the India-US DTAA and Indian withholding tax rules apply to the most common payment scenarios between US companies and their Indian subsidiaries — including the specific US tech platforms your Indian team uses every day.

Example A — US parent pays dividend to its Indian subsidiary's profits back to the US

US technology company (100% owner of Indian subsidiary) declares a dividend of INR 2 crore from the Indian subsidiary to the US parent.

ItemDetail
DTAA rate (100% holding = ≥10%)15% under Article 10(2)(a). Any comparison with the domestic rate must use the rate, surcharge, cess and facts applicable on the payment date.
Documents neededForm 6166 from IRS + Form 41 on India portal + beneficial ownership declaration; check the applicable part of Form 15CA and whether Form 15CB is required
US tax treatmentDividend included in US corporate income. Foreign tax credit (Form 1118) claimed for the 15% Indian TDS against US federal tax liability.
FEMA complianceDividend remittance requires KRPR to manage RBI outward remittance compliance alongside Form 15CA/15CB
Key watch-outThe US parent should make the applicable tax-residency and beneficial-ownership documents available before the Indian subsidiary applies the treaty rate at withholding. Allow adequate time to obtain Form 6166 from the IRS.

Example B — US parent charges management fees to Indian subsidiary

US parent charges INR 1.5 crore per year for CEO oversight, group HR, group legal, and finance co-ordination services to the Indian subsidiary.

ItemDetail
DTAA characterisationBusiness Profits — Article 7. Management and co-ordination services do not pass the FIS "make available" test. The Indian subsidiary does not receive transferable technical knowledge. Confirmed by Calcutta High Court (Timken, 2016) and multiple ITAT rulings.
Withholding tax (if no US PE in India)Zero. Under Article 7, if the US parent has no PE in India, its business profits are not taxable in India. No TDS deduction required.
Transfer pricing requirementINR 1.5 crore must be arm's length. Cost allocation study required — documenting what services are provided, actual cost to US parent, direct benefit to Indian entity. Form 3CEB mandatory (aggregate intercompany >INR 1 crore).
Common mistakeDeducting 15% TDS on management fees assuming FIS applies — when Article 7 Business Profits is the correct position. Taking specialist advice before the first payment can save 15% on every annual management fee going forward.

Example C — Indian subsidiary pays for LinkedIn Premium / Sales Navigator (Microsoft/LinkedIn — US company)

Indian subsidiary subscribes to LinkedIn Sales Navigator at approx. INR 1,00,000/year for the sales team. Payment goes to LinkedIn Ireland (Microsoft group — Irish entity billing for India, ultimately US parent).

ItemDetail
Is this a royalty?No. The Indian company receives the right to use the LinkedIn platform — not the right to reproduce, modify, or sublicence the underlying software or data. Supreme Court Engineering Analysis ruling (2021) confirmed: end-user SaaS licences are not royalties.
Is this FIS?No. LinkedIn does not transfer any technical knowledge, skill or know-how that the Indian company can apply independently. Access to a hosted platform is not a make-available service.
DTAA characterisationBusiness Profits — Article 7. If the relevant non-resident has no PE in India and the payment is properly characterised as business profits under the applicable treaty, the treaty position may result in no Indian withholding. This must be verified from the contracting entity and documents.
Indian GST position18% GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) applies. The Indian company must self-assess and pay 18% GST on the subscription as an import of service. This GST is recoverable as Input Tax Credit (ITC) if used for business purposes.
Practical complianceThe withholding position and remittance documentation must be checked from the invoice, agreement, contracting entity and applicable treaty. The applicable part of Form 15CA, and whether Form 15CB is required, must be assessed separately. GST under RCM should also be evaluated and reported where applicable.
Watch-outWhere the invoice is issued by LinkedIn Ireland Ltd, the India-Ireland treaty—not the India-US treaty—must be analysed. Standard end-user access without copyright rights may generally be treated as business profits, but the agreement, invoice, treaty, domestic law and PE position must be reviewed before deciding withholding.

Example D — Indian subsidiary pays for ChatGPT (OpenAI) or Claude (Anthropic) subscriptions

Indian subsidiary subscribes to ChatGPT Team (OpenAI — US company) or Claude Pro/Team (Anthropic — US company) for its knowledge workers. Annual cost approximately INR 2–5 lakh depending on seats.

The Finance Act 2026 introduced a tax exemption for foreign companies on income earned from providing data centre services to specified Indian data centres, effective 1 April 2026. This does not directly affect SaaS subscription payments — but signals India's intent to attract AI infrastructure investment.
ItemDetail
Is this a royalty?No. The Indian company receives API access or web interface access to a hosted AI model. It does not receive the underlying LLM weights, training data, source code, or any IP. End-user access ≠ copyright licence. Engineering Analysis applies.
Is this FIS under India-US DTAA?No. Accessing a hosted AI assistant does not "make available" technical knowledge or skill that the Indian entity can independently replicate or deploy. The Indian entity cannot run ChatGPT or Claude independently after the subscription ends. No make-available. No FIS.
DTAA characterisationStandard end-user access without copyright rights or transfer of technical know-how may generally be characterised as Business Profits under Article 7. Any no-withholding conclusion depends on the contracting entity, invoice, agreement, applicable treaty and absence of a PE in India.
Indian GST position18% GST under RCM. Same as LinkedIn — import of service. Self-assess GST at 18%, pay in GSTR-3B, claim ITC if eligible.
What if the Indian company accesses the API to build its own product?Same analysis applies to standard API access under OpenAI's/Anthropic's terms. However, if a custom model training arrangement or fine-tuning agreement involves the US company developing and transferring a technical model to the Indian entity, that arrangement should be reviewed separately — it may constitute a royalty or FIS.
Finance Act 2026 note

Example E — Indian subsidiary pays for Salesforce or Microsoft 365 (US companies)

Indian subsidiary pays INR 10 lakh/year for Salesforce CRM licences or Microsoft 365 Business subscriptions. The invoices may be issued by Salesforce.com Singapore or Microsoft Ireland, so the treaty applicable to the actual contracting entity—not the India-US treaty—must be analysed.

ItemDetail
Is this a royalty?No — confirmed by Supreme Court. Engineering Analysis (2021) specifically involved Microsoft software licences and held that off-the-shelf software licences are not royalties. Salesforce CRM access is squarely in this category.
Is this FIS?No. Using Salesforce or Microsoft 365 does not make available any technical know-how the Indian entity can replicate independently. Standard end-user access generally does not make available technical know-how, subject to the contract and applicable treaty.
Withholding taxStandard end-user access may be treated as Business Profits where no copyright rights are granted. Any no-withholding conclusion depends on the applicable treaty and absence of a PE.
GST under RCM18% applies. Same treatment as all foreign SaaS — import of service, reverse charge, ITC if eligible.
What about Microsoft 365 implementation consulting by Microsoft employees visiting India?This is a separate question. If Microsoft personnel visit India and provide technical implementation services that train the Indian team to independently manage the platform — this may constitute FIS (or FTS under the applicable bilateral treaty based on billing entity). Duration and nature of engagement matter. A 2-day training session likely does not make available lasting know-how. A 90-day implementation engagement that results in the Indian team independently managing the system might.

Example F — US parent licences IP or software to Indian subsidiary

US parent owns proprietary software and licenses it to the Indian subsidiary for use in delivering services to Indian clients. Indian subsidiary pays INR 2 crore per year as a software licence fee. The US parent holds the copyright and the Indian subsidiary has a licence to use — but not to modify, reproduce, or sublicence.

ItemDetail
DTAA characterisationThis is more nuanced than pure SaaS. A licence from the US parent specifically to the Indian subsidiary for use in its business may be characterised differently from a standard commercial SaaS subscription. If the licence involves any transfer of right in the copyright itself — the right to reproduce, modify, or use the underlying code — it may be a royalty. If it is merely an end-user licence with no IP transfer, Engineering Analysis applies.
Withholding tax if royalty15% under Article 12(2)(a) of the India-US DTAA (copyright/patent/trademark royalties). Transfer pricing documentation and Form 3CEB required.
Withholding tax if not royalty (end-user licence)Zero — Business Profits under Article 7, no PE. Engineering Analysis applies.
How to distinguishKey question: does the Indian subsidiary receive rights in the copyright, or merely the right to use the software? End-user licence (EULA) terms with no source code access, no right to reproduce, no sublicencing = not a royalty. A licence that grants rights to modify, reproduce, or sub-licence = royalty. Intercompany IP licences for proprietary software are often drafted without this distinction in mind — KRPR reviews and corrects these as part of the TP documentation process.

Summary — withholding tax and compliance at a glance

PaymentDTAA treatmentWithholding rateGST (RCM)Form 41 + TRC needed?
Dividends (≥10% holding)Article 10 — 15%15%NoYes
Dividends (<10% holding)Article 10 — 25%25%NoYes
InterestArticle 1110% for bank/similar financial institution/insurance-company loans; 15% in other cases18% RCM, subject to the nature of the transactionYes
Software royalty (IP transferred)Article 12 — 15%15%18% RCMYes
Management fees (no make-available)Article 7 — Business Profits0% if no PE18% RCMForm 15CA applicability must be checked separately
Standard SaaS subscriptionsMay be Article 7 Business Profits where no copyright rights or technical know-how are transferred; apply the treaty of the actual contracting entityPotentially nil if the classification is supported and the non-resident has no PE18% RCM, subject to the factsCheck Form 15CA applicability and whether Form 15CB is required separately
Technical training that transfers lasting know-howArticle 12(4) — FIS at 15%15%18% RCMYes

7. India-US DTAA vs India-UK DTAA — Key Differences for Intercompany Charges

If you manage subsidiaries in both India and the UK, understanding how these two treaties differ is critical — the same intercompany charge can have completely different withholding consequences depending on which treaty applies.

Charge typeIndia-US DTAAIndia-UK DTAA
Management fees0% — not FIS (make-available test not met)0% — managerial services expressly excluded from FTS in Article 13(4), and make-available test also not met. Same outcome, stronger protection.
Advisory / consultancy fees0% — not FIS (Timken ruling, Calcutta HC 2016)0% — not FTS if no make-available (Mumbai ITAT 2024, Buro Happold 2022). Both treaties reach same outcome — India-UK has additional express managerial services exclusion.
SaaS subscriptions0% — not royalty, not FIS0% — not royalty, not FTS (Engineering Analysis applies to both)
Software IP licence15% — Article 12(2)(a) royalty15% — Article 13 royalty
Technical training (make-available)15% — FIS Article 12(4)15% — FTS Article 13
Dividends15% (≥10%) or 25% (<10%)15% (flat)
PE — construction threshold120 days9 months
PE — services threshold90 days90 days
MLI / anti-avoidanceNo MLI — US has not adopted it. No PPT.MLI applies — PPT can deny treaty benefits if no genuine substance

✅ Key takeaway for US companies: The practical outcome on management fees and advisory fees is the same under both treaties — zero withholding if no PE. The India-UK DTAA additionally expressly excludes managerial services from FTS, while the India-US DTAA relies on the make-available test alone. The real differences between the two treaties are: dividends (15% flat under UK vs 15/25% by holding under US), the PE construction threshold (9 months UK vs 120 days US), and the MLI anti-avoidance rules (apply to UK, not to US). However, the India-US DTAA's 120-day construction PE threshold and the saving clause on US corporate taxation are important disadvantages to understand.


8. What Most DTAA Guides Don't Tell US Companies About the India-US Treaty

The US has not adopted the OECD MLI — which matters for anti-avoidance

Unlike the UK, Germany, Singapore, and most EU countries, the United States has not signed or ratified the OECD Multilateral Instrument (MLI). This means the Principal Purpose Test (PPT) — which can deny DTAA benefits where one purpose of a transaction is to access treaty rates — does not apply to the India-US DTAA. However, India's domestic GAAR (General Anti-Avoidance Rules) apply independently and can be invoked where arrangements lack commercial substance. The CBDT confirmed in a 31 March 2026 notification that GAAR does not apply to investments made before 1 April 2017 — but applies to all new arrangements. US companies should document commercial substance in their India structures regardless of MLI's non-application.

The dividend rate for under-10% holdings (25%) is worse than the domestic rate (20.8%)

This catches many US investors by surprise. For portfolio holdings in Indian companies — US private equity funds, US institutional investors, US minority shareholders — the India-US DTAA's 25% dividend rate is worse than India's domestic withholding rate of approximately 20.8%. In these situations, claiming the DTAA is counter-productive. Indian domestic law is more beneficial — you should not invoke the treaty rate. This is one of the few situations where opting out of the DTAA is the correct tax position.

Cost-to-cost reimbursements are not taxable — even if the make-available test is unclear

The ITAT Delhi confirmed in Invesco Holding Company (2025): where a US parent charges its Indian subsidiary for IT and support services on a cost-to-cost basis with no markup, the amount received is a cost reimbursement — not income. Even if the services might otherwise qualify as FIS, a payment with no profit element embedded in it is not "income" and therefore not taxable in India, regardless of the FIS characterisation. For US companies that allocate group shared service costs to India on a pure cost basis, this provides a strong protection from withholding tax — but the cost allocation must be genuinely at cost with no markup.

The 120-day construction PE threshold has caught US IT companies off guard

The India-US DTAA specifies a 120-day threshold for construction and installation projects creating a PE — one of the shortest thresholds in any of India's bilateral treaties. India-UK is 9 months; India-Australia uses 6 months. Many US IT and engineering companies deploy project teams to India for extended periods assuming a generous PE threshold applies. At day 121, a PE of the US parent exists — and profits attributable to it are taxable in India at 40% plus surcharge and cess. Track India project days per engagement and per financial year.


9. Frequently Asked Questions

What is the India-US DTAA?

The India-US DTAA is a bilateral tax treaty signed on 12 September 1989 (last amended 2000) that prevents double taxation of income between India and the US. For US companies with Indian subsidiaries, it sets maximum withholding tax rates on dividends (15/25%), interest (10% for bank/similar financial institution or insurance-company loans; 15% in other cases), royalties (10/15%), and fees for included services (10/15%), and defines when a US company creates a taxable PE in India.

What withholding tax rate applies when a US parent receives dividends from its Indian subsidiary?

15% if the US parent holds at least 10% of the voting stock (which covers most wholly owned subsidiaries). 25% if the US parent holds less than 10% — in which case the domestic Indian rate of ~20.8% is more beneficial and should be used instead of the treaty rate.

What is the difference between FTS and FIS?

FTS (Fees for Technical Services) appears in the India-UK and most other DTAAs — it broadly covers managerial, technical, and consultancy services. FIS (Fees for Included Services) in the India-US DTAA is narrower — it only covers services that make available technical knowledge, skill or know-how, or that are ancillary to a royalty. Pure management fees, advisory fees, and co-ordination charges typically do not qualify as FIS and are instead Business Profits under Article 7 — not taxable in India if no US PE exists.

Does TDS apply to LinkedIn Premium subscriptions paid by an Indian subsidiary?

Standard end-user access without copyright rights or transfer of technical know-how may generally be treated as Business Profits rather than royalty or FIS. Because the invoice may be issued by an Irish entity, the applicable treaty must be identified. Any no-withholding conclusion depends on the agreement and absence of a PE in India. 18% GST under RCM applies separately, recoverable as ITC.

Does TDS apply to ChatGPT (OpenAI) or Claude (Anthropic) subscriptions?

Standard hosted-service access without copyright rights or transfer of technical know-how may generally be treated as Business Profits rather than royalty or FIS. Any no-withholding conclusion depends on the contracting entity, invoice, agreement, applicable treaty and absence of a PE in India. 18% GST under RCM applies.

What creates a Permanent Establishment in India for a US company?

A fixed place of business, a construction/installation project lasting more than 120 days (note: shorter than most treaties), service personnel furnishing services in India for more than 90 days in any 12-month period (with a separate rule for services to an associated enterprise that can apply without the usual 90-day threshold), or a dependent agent habitually concluding contracts on behalf of the US company. A US company's Indian subsidiary is not automatically a PE — but activities conducted by or through the subsidiary can create one.

How does the India-US DTAA differ from the India-UK DTAA for intercompany charges?

Both treaties require the actual service to be tested against the relevant article. Under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA, managerial services are expressly excluded and technical or consultancy services generally require the make-available condition. Under the India-US DTAA, Article 12 applies the Fees for Included Services test. Neither treaty produces a blanket 15% result for routine intercompany charges. The India-UK DTAA is more favourable on dividends (flat 15% vs 15/25% under India-US) and has a longer construction PE threshold (9 months vs 120 days).

How does a US company claim DTAA benefits in India?

Obtain Form 6166 (Tax Residency Certificate) from the IRS, file Form 41 on India's Income Tax e-filing portal (replaces Form 10F, effective 1 April 2026), provide a beneficial ownership declaration, and the Indian subsidiary checks the applicable part of Form 15CA and whether Form 15CB is required before remitting. The applicable tax-residency and beneficial-ownership documents should be available before the Indian payer applies the treaty rate at withholding.

Does the India-US DTAA have a saving clause?

Yes. Article 1 preserves the US's right to tax its citizens and corporations on worldwide income regardless of the treaty. US companies with Indian subsidiaries are taxed in the US on Indian profits — relief from double taxation comes through the Foreign Tax Credit (Form 1118), not treaty exemptions.

Does the MLI apply to the India-US DTAA?

No. The United States has not adopted or ratified the OECD Multilateral Instrument. The Principal Purpose Test (PPT) that applies to the India-UK and India-Australia DTAAs does not apply to the India-US DTAA. However, India's domestic GAAR provisions apply independently to arrangements lacking genuine commercial substance.

What is the withholding tax on royalties under the India-US DTAA?

15% for copyright, patent, trademark, and secret process royalties under Article 12(2)(a). 10% for equipment rental royalties and FIS payments ancillary to royalties under Article 12(2)(b). The domestic Indian rate without the treaty is approximately 20.8%.


Need help with India-US DTAA compliance for your Indian subsidiary?

KRPR & Associates manages Form 15CA/15CB filings, Form 41, IRS Form 6166 co-ordination, transfer pricing documentation, and FEMA compliance for US companies with Indian subsidiaries. We respond within one business day.

Request a senior consultation →

Or write to rohit@krprassociates.com  ·  +91 91566 68806

KRPR & Associates  ·  Chartered Accountants  ·  ICAI Reg. No. 139415  ·  Peer Reviewed  ·  Pune, India  ·  Practicing since 2012

Enquire Now